https://law.temple.edu/news/the-institute-for-law-innovation-technology-ilit-launches-at-temple-law/
With rapid digitization and expanding technological horizons all around us, we often associate “technology” with sophisticated devices we use but do not understand, and “law and tech” with complicated rules that elude comprehension. But, as Laura Bingham, executive director of Temple’s newly launched Institute for Law, Innovation & Technology (iLIT), explains, the future relationship ...
https://sites.temple.edu/ticlj/files/2017/02/30.1.Scharre-TICLJ.pdf
Paul Scharre* Much of the debate on autonomous weapons presumes a choice between human versus autonomous decision-making over targeting and engagement decisions. In fact, in many situations, human-machine teaming in engagement decisions will not only be possible but preferable. Hybrid human-machine cognitive architectures will be able to leverage the precision and reliability of automation ...
https://cis.temple.edu/~tug29203/19spring-5617/lectures/ch3-3.pdf
Lecture 6 – Chapter 3 TCP flow and congestion control CIS 5617, Fall 2019 Anduo Wang Based on Slides created by JFK/KWR
https://sites.temple.edu/ticlj/files/2017/02/27.1.Bricker-TICLJ.pdf
Long ago, American legislatures and courts rejected such a defense for various reasons that make sense under both a utilitarian and retributivist model of punishment.2 Prior to developments in modern medicine, many injuries that are treatable today led to death3 and were treated as murder under different theories such as depraved heart murder. Further, based on the immutable facts in the above ...
https://law.temple.edu/aer/2019/03/23/opening-statement-v-argument-where-is-the-line/
State v. McMillion, 23 Neb. App. 687, 875 N.W.2d 877 (2016). In an opening statement, it is permissible for the State to discuss what the evidence may show. Id. In view of the considerable latitude given in making opening statements, we cannot conclude an objection to the State’s comments would have been sustained. State v.